Style Switcher

Layout Style


Background Pattern

Color Scheme

Dak Prescott denies spitting at Jalen Carter after ejection in Eagles–Cowboys opener

Dak Prescott denies spitting at Jalen Carter after ejection in Eagles–Cowboys opener

What happened on opening night

Six seconds into the 2025 NFL season, the rivalry already boiled over. Philadelphia Eagles defensive tackle Jalen Carter was ejected during an injury timeout right after the opening kickoff for spitting on Dallas Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott. Officials hit Carter with a 15-yard unsportsmanlike conduct penalty and tossed him. Eagles head of security “Big Dom” DiSandro escorted the young lineman to the locker room as the home crowd processed an ejection before a snap had been taken.

The night itself was chaotic. Philadelphia was raising its Super Bowl LIX banner, a lightning delay split the first half, and the Eagles held on 24-20. The Carter incident overshadowed much of the buildup and left both teams answering for something that happened before the offense had even huddled.

Prescott, initially measured, told reporters the spitting was “more of a surprise than anything.” He said the Cowboys welcomed the 15 yards but admitted he didn’t expect an ejection that early. That seemed like the end of it—until another clip circulated after the game.

In that second video, Prescott stands between two offensive linemen as Carter is being led off. Prescott appears to spit at the ground in Carter’s direction while smiling. The moment was quick, but the internet did what it does: freeze-frames, zooms, and a rush to assign intent. Was it retaliation? Taunting? Or simply a spit into the turf with bad optics?

Prescott moved to clarify the next day. He said he was not trying to spit on Carter, and that his spit hit the ground. His point: there’s a difference between spitting on someone and spitting near someone, especially from a distance with no physical contact. Carter, for his part, apologized for the opening flashpoint that got him tossed from a high-stakes night for the Eagles.

The entire sequence fed the rivalry’s fire. This is usually a December headline—personal fouls, emotions, and the microscope on every exchange. Instead, it arrived before the first offensive play, and it instantly set the tone for a stop-start opener in a loud, storm-interrupted stadium.

What the rules say and what comes next

On the rulebook: spitting on an opponent is unsportsmanlike conduct. It’s a personal foul under Rule 12 and can lead to immediate disqualification if the act is deemed flagrant. That explains Carter’s ejection. The judgment call belongs to officials on the field, and the league office reviews it after the game for potential fines.

But what about spitting on the ground near someone? That’s the gray area. The NFL doesn’t have a line-by-line prohibition against spitting onto the turf in the general direction of another player from several feet away. If it’s not directly on an opponent and isn’t judged as taunting or baiting in the moment, it typically isn’t a foul. That tracks with postgame reporting from NFL Network’s Tom Pelissero, who said Prescott was not expected to face discipline.

Could the league still issue a warning or a fine for taunting? It could, in theory. The league office can review any conduct that might incite or escalate conflict. In past seasons, postgame reviews have led to fines for gestures officials missed live. But the standard is higher than a bad look on camera. There has to be a clear violation—something beyond a spit into the ground while a player is being escorted away by security.

Prescott’s explanation aligns with that threshold. He acknowledged spitting on the turf and denied spitting at Carter. No official flagged him on the field, and no rule explicitly bars the act he described. That’s why there’s no expectation of discipline. It’s also why the conversation has largely moved from “will he be suspended?” to “should he have done it at all?”

Context matters here. Carter had just been ejected for spitting on Prescott’s jersey. Emotions run hot in this matchup—multiple times a year, prime-time slots, playoff implications often attached. Players are human. They react. The line the league polices is whether those reactions cross into unsportsmanlike territory by rule, and in Carter’s case, officials made that call instantly.

Carter’s apology matters, too. An early-season ejection creates baggage: hurt your rotation, put stress on substitutions, and hand the opponent free yardage. It also invites league review. Historically, fines for unsportsmanlike acts like spitting land the following week after the operations department completes its film study. Those fines are standardized on a schedule the NFLPA reviews annually.

Philadelphia overcame the early chaos anyway. The banner went up. The weather delay stretched the night. The defense settled. The offense did enough to win by four. But a memorable opener is now tied to a clip that will live all year: a star defender tossed in the first minute and the opposing quarterback caught in a split-second reaction that spawned a debate.

Inside the Cowboys’ locker room, the message was restraint. Prescott’s tone after the game—surprised but not raging—kept things from escalating. Dallas didn’t call for further punishment. The Eagles didn’t push back publicly beyond Carter’s apology. Sometimes a rivalry can burn without adding lighter fluid.

Still, there are two lingering threads. First, how the league frames spitting incidents going forward. Ejections at the six-second mark of the season are rare, and this one sets a baseline that officials may follow. Second, the social-media effect. Players know they’re on camera at all times. Anything that reads as taunting, even if it isn’t a foul, becomes a story. That shapes behavior as much as fines do.

For the Cowboys, the focus turns to correcting the details that flipped a one-score game. For the Eagles, it’s about channeling the emotional edge without losing bodies to preventable penalties. The banner is hung. The tape is in. The league office will do its Monday review. Then everyone moves on—until these two line up again and all of this becomes part of the pregame montage.

For now, the key facts stand: Carter was ejected for spitting on Prescott’s jersey and later apologized. Prescott says he spit on the ground, not at Carter, and is not expected to be disciplined. The video will keep circulating, the debate will simmer, and the rivalry will take care of the rest.

Share With Friends